For some, faith is the ultimate display of humility and submissiveness to a higher power whose existence has never been objectively substantiated. The phenomenon is utterly bizarre due to the fact that educated, intelligent and thinking individuals also have the predilection towards such surrender to a random force. Despite the way they process information and empirical data, even the smartest seem to voluntarily give up their skepticism and inquisitiveness all in the name of convenience and blindly submitting to an unsubstantiated claim.
On the assumption that a god exists, the humility is only directed towards that being. Isn’t it supposedly ironic that a being so powerful and omnipresent would require absolute submission despite little to no evidence of his existence. Sure, christians always use the retarded Oh, look at how pretty the blue sky is! Look at the birds, the other animals and the trees! We live in a world of beauty… ERGO, god exists argument as if it holds water as a point. Even if a god created everything, it says nothing about the christian god being the one who created it. That christian god is more of a human construct that only happens to be prominent now because of the war-mongering Romans and the colonizing Europeans.
This is were the faith is stretched. Faith is already a big stretch in itself. It’s akin to believing an egomaniac of a god who requires constant adoration, praise and prayers from his loyal subjects. He requires it despite not even proving his existence in a form that can be appreciated by everyone. In the end, faith is simply a crutch for arrogance used by many to brandish around as fake armor of morality and decency. Faith is nothing but an excuse – and yes, surrender — to further inquiry. It is a feel-good option that is laced with intellectual laziness and haughtiness that fails to deliver on empirical standards.
The faithful, despite their claims of humility, are just as arrogant as everybody else that they tag as arrogant. They wield their faith as an unquestionable concept despite its obvious logical flaws and use it to rebut the better argued points that are grounded on grammar and common sense but are not imbued with the mystic abilities of faith. The concept of god was created by man and faith is the absolute manifestation of that arrogance.
Man doesn’t want to be alone, thus, he created god in many images. He refused to believe the more gloomy yet more likely reality that his god may not really be extant at all. Man is arrogant in not conceding to the depression of a lonely existence – and as we see now, faith is being used as an excuse for patronage for the ideal and exaltation for the divine. In the end, man is simply worshiping his own model – his own paradigm. And of course, he will never accept that reality.
Bookmark at:
StumbleUpon | Digg | Del.icio.us | Dzone | Newsvine | Spurl | Simpy | Furl | Reddit | Yahoo! MyWeb



xeno: "sorry for my misspelling again"
Believe me, spelling is the least of your problems
)
"this guy do not understand english."
You mean this guy DOES not understand English. Jesus Christ, xeno, if you're going to criticize somebody's English usage, you better make sure your own use of the language isn't laughably inept!
"i stop envolving myself from the logic of the orignal issue."
That's not our problem. We're still very much "envolved" (LOL) with the original issue, and we don't give a flying fuck if you think you have a "moral" case against our criticism, bottom line is, you haven't explained your side, which justifies our continued belief that you're too stupid to reason your way through.
"my reason has been uttered on my previous comments above. i hate repeating it."
We heard you the first time. We just don't believe you.
WE DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR STUPID FUCKING "MORAL ISSUE". We just care about your missing explanation of the "one-sided" comment.
Stop making excuses, and either tell us why you think benj's argument is one-sided, or prepare to be continuously mocked for your stupidity.
4.54 billion years, sir.
Thank you, pilosopotasyo. If we were to take the Bible literally, though, that's about 4.54 billion years off. Literalist scholars like Bishop Ussher have calculated the Earth according to the Bible at about 6-10,000 years old. Science and a literal reading of the Bible cannot be reconciled – and that reading of 1 day=1 million years doesn't make any sense, either, and at best it sounds strained.
I can only look at the Bible this way: a book of its time, written by Bronze Age Middle Eastern citizens, and limited by its writers' perspective. No divine inspiration, no "predictions". The explanations of science following the Bible's predictions sounds rather ad hoc to me, and it's easy to apply to other books if you know how. (The Quran probably supports space flight if you know where to look!)
GRABE ANG HABA NG FILLER!!!
“this guy do not understand english.â€
You mean this guy DOES not understand English. Jesus Christ, xeno, if you’re going to criticize somebody’s English usage, you better make sure your own use of the language isn’t laughably inept!(micketymoc)
this guy is really stupid. i do not consider myself as perfect in the english language (i.e. spelling) but, his dirty trick is his only way to evade the moral issue. lame excuse. read better, stupid guy. i've raised lots of sensible questions but he is good in evading.
WE DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR STUPID FUCKING “MORAL ISSUEâ€. We just care about your missing explanation of the “one-sided†comment.
Stop making excuses, and either tell us why you think benj’s argument is one-sided, or prepare to be continuously mocked for your stupidity.(miketymoc)
what can expect from your fucking idiocy? your idiocy is clear. you can not even know that the issue has become a moral issue. a narrow and shallow minded one.
xeno: “sorry for my misspelling againâ€
Believe me, spelling is the least of your problems
)
(missingpoints)
ah, this guy who is 'illiterate'. an unrepentant of his illiteracy. he can not even accept his obvious error (#116 & #130). you should have been technically blown-out from the argumentation.
Stop making excuses, and either tell us why you think benj’s argument is one-sided, or prepare to be continuously mocked for your stupidity.(micketymoc)
you are 'illiterate' too. i stop elaborating myself on the original issue (the logical issue of the article above)because your kind is stupid (take note that you made the first move). i do not need to spend my enery and time with your stupid kind (micketymoc and missingpoints). sigh* you do not know how to read. you lack reading capability. lol. scatter your dirty language wherever and whenever you want. still, you do not know how to read.
missingpoints Says:
May 29th, 2008 at 10:11 am
@missingpoints
No, you did not commit any “logical fallacy†when you chose not to explain your initial statement. Of course it is your right not to explain yourself. I am not questioning that. ]
*** then why do you try the impossible? if my right not to speak about the logical issue of the article (The Arrogance of Faith) because of your own stupidity? will you lose something? will I lose something? why then you keep on saying that I'm making excuses? so, are you not satisfied with your belief that i'm making excuses? then why then you keep on going with this nonsense? if you think deeper, maybe you can have a better perspective that the issue is a moral issue.
@missingpoints
However, the fact that you refuse to further explain your side casts doubt on your intentions and/or ability to explain. We have no idea whether you actually have a case to make or if you’re just bullshitting. We’re at post #154 and you still haven’t contributed anything to the actual topic of this thread. Instead we’ve spend the past dozen posts arguing whether you do have something up your sleeve.
***pity. yo can not accept the truth that you lack good reading and even you are repentant of misrepresenting my thoughts. and you are even defending your obvious mistake. there would be no hope of intellectual gaining if your attitude is like that. look. to make things easier for you (and micketymoc) I label the issue of the article 'The Arrogance of FAith' as the Logical Issue (all the issues necessarily (of course logical) related to it. And I label the present issue between us as the Moral issue (why moral? because the issue now is how we deliver or express ourselves here where are character or attitude are being involved or the main point. of course, this issue is also being disputed with our knowledge of what is being logical is.
You still believe that i do not have something in my mind to say on the logical issue. you still believe that i'm making excuses. what you can not see is, i stop myself into speaking of the logical issue because of your stupid characters. if you believe that i'm making excuse or i do not have something in my mind, what then are you trying to point at me. if you believe, then why waste your time just as you think i;m wasting my time with you? are'nt you contradicting yourself? aren't you still aware that the issue now is a moral issue? and micketymoc do not know that this issue becomes a moral issue?
So to recap: yes, you have the right to refuse to explain your side and we have the right to ridicule you for that.
Unless you wish to actually explain why the original post is “one-sided.†In which case we’d be glad to discuss and debate you on it.
missingpoints Says:
May 29th, 2008 at 10:11 am
@missingpoints
No, you did not commit any “logical fallacy†when you chose not to explain your initial statement. Of course it is your right not to explain yourself. I am not questioning that. ]
*** then why do you try the impossible? if my right not to speak about the logical issue of the article (The Arrogance of Faith) because of your own stupidity? will you lose something? will I lose something? why then you keep on saying that I'm making excuses? so, are you not satisfied with your belief that i'm making excuses? then why then you keep on going with this nonsense? if you think deeper, maybe you can have a better perspective that the issue is a moral issue.
@missingpoints
However, the fact that you refuse to further explain your side casts doubt on your intentions and/or ability to explain. We have no idea whether you actually have a case to make or if you’re just bullshitting. We’re at post #154 and you still haven’t contributed anything to the actual topic of this thread. Instead we’ve spend the past dozen posts arguing whether you do have something up your sleeve.
***pity. yo can not accept the truth that you lack good reading and even you are repentant of misrepresenting my thoughts. and you are even defending your obvious mistake. there would be no hope of intellectual gaining if your attitude is like that. look. to make things easier for you (and micketymoc) I label the issue of the article 'The Arrogance of FAith' as the Logical Issue (all the issues necessarily (of course logical) related to it. And I label the present issue between us as the Moral issue (why moral? because the issue now is how we deliver or express ourselves here where are character or attitude are being involved or the main point. of course, this issue is also being disputed with our knowledge of what is being logical is.
You still believe that i do not have something in my mind to say on the logical issue. you still believe that i'm making excuses. what you can not see is, i stop myself into speaking of the logical issue because of your stupid characters. if you believe that i'm making excuse or i do not have something in my mind, what then are you trying to point at me. if you believe, then why waste your time just as you think i;m wasting my time with you? are'nt you contradicting yourself? aren't you still aware that the issue now is a moral issue? and micketymoc do not know that this issue becomes a moral issue?
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xeno: "aren’t you still aware that the issue now is a moral issue? and micketymoc do not know that this issue becomes a moral issue?"
No, it hasn't.
You're the only one saying that it has become a moral issue.
You're the only one trying to change the subject.
You're the only one who refuses to answer the oh-so-simple question that missingpoints and I have been posing from the beginning:
Why is benj's argument one-sided?
Is that so difficult to answer?
Were you so blinded by our initial mild criticism that you can focus on nothing but your perceived sense of offense?
Are you really so fucking dense not to realize that we have no patience with an exceedingly obvious attempt to divert the issue?
Are you so ARROGANT to believe that you can single-handedly decide what the issue is and what it isn't?
Grow up.
Answer the question.
With every post you make that avoids the question we've asked from the beginning, you prove even more that you're extremely stupid, exceedingly slow-witted, and absolutely, ABSOLUTELY proof of benj's point: that idiocy breeds arrogance, and the idiocy of the religious breeds INCOMPARABLE arrogance.
xeno:"then why do you try the impossible? if my right not to speak about the logical issue of the article (The Arrogance of Faith) because of your own stupidity? will you lose something? will I lose something? why then you keep on saying that I’m making excuses? so, are you not satisfied with your belief that i’m making excuses? then why then you keep on going with this nonsense?"
There are two possibilities: (1) you have nothing and are harping on this "moral issue" to divert attention, in which case you're an idiot or (2) you really have something but refuse to share it because you felt offended, in which case you're a pompous, arrogant ass.
So which is it?
My money's on (1), although I'll bet he'll claim it's (2) without admitting to the pompous, arrogant ass part. Which of course, he is.
My money’s on (1), although I’ll bet he’ll claim it’s (2) without admitting to the pompous, arrogant ass part. Which of course, he is.(micketymoc)
of course you two stupid always committ straw man. go back to some of my previous comment where you've been actually annhilated and you were just already saving your faces. lame excuse. wicked sick.
missingpoints Says:
June 1st, 2008 at 8:26 pm
xeno:â€then why do you try the impossible? if my right not to speak about the logical issue of the article (The Arrogance of Faith) because of your own stupidity? will you lose something? will I lose something? why then you keep on saying that I’m making excuses? so, are you not satisfied with your belief that i’m making excuses? then why then you keep on going with this nonsense?â€
There are two possibilities: (1) you have nothing and are harping on this “moral issue†to divert attention, in which case you’re an idiot or (2) you really have something but refuse to share it because you felt offended, in which case you’re a pompous, arrogant ass.
So which is it? (missingpoints)
of course you are known for your inability to understand my replies.
1. this is a moral issue. still your stupidity can not grasp it. lol. you're telling me that i am an idiot. your strawman argument is your tactic just to cover your obvious mistakes which you can not accept. #116/#130 were evidence. you can not show something against me that i maybe technically lost in the argumentation. agaibn. twice stupid because you said that i'm saying that this is already a moral argument..lol again. of course this event is already a moral argument. in waht sense that i must divert if the fact that what's happening to us is a moral issue. stupid and 'illiterate'. my harsh language is due to your own stupidity. i do not regret.
2. what to you think of yourself. you can not still graps what i mean. what are you or who are you in m life to waste my intelligence on the logical issue. idiot. you can not still get what i mean..you arrogant ass-full brainless superficial and shallow character.
@171 bymicketmoc
go back and read my prveious replies why i stop to comment on the logical issue. pity, but you are stupid to understand my statements. this is how it goes. what power you have that i must say something on the logical issue? idiot. the ultimate truth is that i disengage myself on the logical issue because of your stupidity. i do not want to waste my intelligence on the logical issue just because of your idiot kind. then cry and kick your ass so that i may say my side on the L.I. poor walnut brain guy.
xeno: "of course you are known for your inability to understand my replies."
Well, your terrible english doesn't help but I understand you quite well.
The problem is that you keep insisting that we follow your lead. This is not a "moral issue," the conduct on this thread is governed by the rules of the blog owner, not by any other poster. If Benj allows this, then it's fine. You can pout all you want but that's the way these blogs work.
I understand you, I just think you're wrong. Just because you keep insisting you're right or that you "annihilated" us doesn't make it so.
"the ultimate truth is that i disengage myself on the logical issue because of your stupidity."
HAHAHAHAHA that's rich. Mr. Evasive can't answer a perfectly intelligent question, but claims superior intelligence nonetheless.
Yeah, yeah, I heard you the last hundred or so times, you say you can't answer because of the "moral issue". Too bad your horrible English and your squid-ink tactics proclaim otherwise.
"i do not want to waste my intelligence on the logical issue just because of your idiot kind."
Waste? Was there any intelligence there to begin with, much less any available to waste?
Let me repeat, xeno you twatwhistle:
We heard you. Moral issue, waste your intelligence, bla bla bla.
We don't believe you.
Now I suggest you answer the question like a man, or go away and stop wasting your energy trying to outrun our arguments on an empty brain.
@micketymoc and missingpoints
hahaha..still these two guys were so stupid not to understand my point. i quit from the logicalissue because of their own stupidity. they can not still get. if they thought i dont have something to say,then why they dont leave it like that and enjoy it..lols…they can not still accept the fact that i do not want to waste my intelligence on the logical issue becauseof their stupidity. shallow and sick.
of course these two guys were fond of committing the strawman argument..they attack my grammar (hehe,let this site becomes a publish book-free from grammar error..that's what you want) and yet it is obvious that my thoughts were clear and that they just can not accept the fact that i do notlike their dullkind to waste my intelligence on the logical issue. speaking of arrogance which they are thinking of me…see your 'ownself' on this thing…stupid two of you.
@xeno
A strawman requires me setting up an easy argument (which you didn't make) to demolish easily. Calling you on your terrible isn't a strawman. Ad hominem, maybe, but not a strawman. Review your logic classes.
Again, we understand your thoughts, we just don't believe them. You claim that you don't want to waste your "intelligence" on us, right? We say that's bullshit as you haven't shown any sign of intelligence yet.
Yup. To credibly claim one's refusal to "waste one's intelligence" on another party, one must show some evidence of intelligence in the first place.
Again, we understand your thoughts, we just don’t believe them. You claim that you don’t want to waste your “intelligence†on us, right? We say that’s bullshit as you haven’t shown any sign of intelligence yet.(missingpoints)
you pretend that you understand me. if you did, you havent shown any sign of witlessness and disorientedness. then let it be. believe what you believe and i do mine. hehe…your unrepentant/unethical character is clear. #116 and 130) is an evidence. pity.
Yup. To credibly claim one’s refusal to “waste one’s intelligence†on another party, one must show some evidence of intelligence in the first place.(micketymoc)
of course this just goes on and on and you just let me do what i do not like to do in your favor. to show my thoughts on the logical issue..sick..because you just try the impossible now. i do not really waste my intelligence to your dull kind.. this is like saying…'oh, pls. xeno say your say on the logical issue, else you are witless and/or unintelligent guy'. then? if that's what you believe then enjoy it. i just see the two of you ( missingpoints) of the dull kind. witless and superficial. that's enough for my observation of you. believe what you believe..
xeno: "#116 and 130) is an evidence. pity."
Wait… so your whole beef is with me mis-attributing Amper's statement to you? If so I apologize. There, happy?
I hope that settles the "moral" issue. So now let's hear what you have to say about the "logical" issue. I'm really curious. Let's see how intelligent you really are.
I hope that settles the “moral†issue. So now let’s hear what you have to say about the “logical†issue. I’m really curious. Let’s see how intelligent you really are.(missingpoint)
* read of what have been said.
No, you haven't said anything about the "logical" issue – i.e. why Benj's post is one-sided. Nothing. Zip. Nada.
You've insisted from near the beginning that this is a moral issue and a moral issue only, never mind the fact that you leaped onto the "moral" issue without even responding to our cross-examination of your original post.
That's what we call "changing the subject", a particularly egregious way of avoiding uncomfortable questions that will reveal one's ignorance.
Come on. We already know you're an idiot. So why don't you proceed from that premise and try to explain, in excruciating xeno-speak, why Benj's argument is one-sided?
I'm particularly amused by the fact that, as every xeno-licious post reveals him as an idiot, he keeps coming back to expose his idiocy even more.
Is there a Guinness Record for Most Moronic Posts in contention right now? I have to give it to ya, xeno, you're getting really close.
@micketymoc
hahaha..of course, you're a flawless stupid. what you want is also to contaminate me with your stupidity.
again…*read of what have been said.
even your rhetorics were insanely conveyed. you can not have the proofs that I'm an idiot. what a real stupid guy
and you're speaking of cross-examination. lol. i can't stop laughing. a cross-examination of what? cross-examining the what from a stupid guy? a stupid guy having a cross examination of what?hahahaha
the fact: the more you talk..the more you are exposing your own stupidity.
^^ But nothing has been said. Most of this thread has been about you fulminating on your "moral issue." You have not provided any argument as to why Benj's post is "one-sided."
^^ But nothing has been said. Most of this thread has been about you fulminating on your “moral issue.†You have not provided any argument as to why Benj’s post is “one-sided.â€(missingpoints)
that what makes you stupid! read of what have been said.
OK, tell us, oh wise one – where have you explained your position why benj's post was one-sided? Just putting the comment number will do.
Oh, and I noticed you just ape every criticism we make. (We say "witless", you say "witless"; we say "moral", you say "moral"; we say "stupid", you say "stupid", etc. etc.) If you absolutely have to sling insults, please be a bit more original, and invent some of your own. Thank you.
@micketymoc
of course you can not stop being stupid. READ OF WHAT HAVE BEEN SAID. Let your eyes roll! lol!
"read of" what? Ohhhh, I see, the guy who can't muster enough brain cells to assemble a coherent sentence has the gall to call his intellectual superiors "stupid". That's OK, I forgive you, inbred retards like yourself usually can't help your behavior.
If "READ OF WHAT HAVE BEEN SAID" (lol) is all you can muster, then I guess the case is closed. xeno has officially proven benj's point, and more besides.
Not only does faith increase arrogance, it decreases intelligence as well.
Swear to Bob that's it, have a good life, xeno!
read of†what? Ohhhh, I see, the guy who can’t muster enough brain cells to assemble a coherent sentence has the gall to call his intellectual superiors “stupidâ€. That’s OK, I forgive you, inbred retards like yourself usually can’t help your behavior.(micketymoc)
hahaha…you're fond of nonsense rhetorics huh…you're salivating with your helpless language…'retard'…can't muster enough brain cells'…oh…so keep that faith that i'm retard..lol…check your demeanor before you check mine./…hehehe…
(If “READ OF WHAT HAVE BEEN SAID†(lol) is all you can muster, then I guess the case is closed. xeno has officially proven benj’s point, and more besides.)(micketymoc)
read again…stupid! ex. read comment #180..read of what have been said..what a flawless stupid..lol..check my behavior? check yours!
Not only does faith increase arrogance, it decreases intelligence as well. (micketymoc)
you're losing poise of course…that you speak lots of nonsense proves nothing for your good..lol
So your only point is that you're too chicken to debate. Fine. You can claim that you're just withholding your "wisdom" from us but that's all that is: a claim. A claim made by someone who hasn't really proven anything online. Not in this thread, nor anywhere else.
Micketymoc and I have been arguing in message boards and posting in our blogs for years; we're pretty confident about our intellectual capacity.
You, on the other hand, can't even post a coherent sentence.
Peace out. We've hijacked Benj's bandwidth too long.
Benj, I think you should write next about "Ignorance and Faith" the two sides of the same coin. (Napadaan lang.) cheers!
So your only point is that you’re too chicken to debate.
(missingpoints)
Of course you are too stupid to understand anything.
(Fine. You can claim that you’re just withholding your “wisdom†from us but that’s all that is: a claim. A claim made by someone who hasn’t really proven anything online.)(missingpoints)
hahaha…a kind of you where to waste my logical understanding of the issue? of course, you are stupid to understand. all have been said but you keep on being stupid. you keep your balls rolling. do i need to prove something to you? i do not waste my intelligence to your stupidity.
(Micketymoc and I have been arguing in message boards and posting in our blogs for years; we’re pretty confident about our intellectual capacity.)(missingpoints)
does that mean you knew everything about logic? does that mean that you are sharpened intellectually? what kind of intelligence you possess? how really you know? you pretend you know anything.pity..
(You, on the other hand, can’t even post a coherent sentence.)(missingpoints)
nice dirty tricks! hehe…i may committ grammatical error. but i do not committ stupid fallacies and obvious mistakes like what you do. you lack depths and wit.
You confuse "understanding" with "believing." We understand what you're saying (that you don't want to share your insights with us) we just DON'T BELIEVE YOU (because we think you're just making excuses).
You confuse “understanding†with “believing.†We understand what you’re saying (that you don’t want to share your insights with us) we just DON’T BELIEVE YOU (because we think you’re just making excuses). (missingpoints)
you are soo funny. you speak of 'understanding' and 'believing'! what an irony. you have the blurred knowledge of the terms. you do not even know how this happens here.i'm laughing because you are actually already very funny because of your stupidity. your lack of depths and common sense makes you stupid. you are not reading of what's being said. did i tell you not to believe of what you believe in this case? how can you excuse yourself from being stupid if you keep on being stupid-shit in this issue? did i tell you not to assume that i excuse myself from the logical issue. ohhh..man, i pity for you. don't be stupid ok?
xeno: did i tell you not to believe of what you believe in this case?
So I'm supposed to just take your word for it? Because that's not how the world works. Do you honestly expect me to believe anything you say just because you said so? How arrogant of you.
[xeno: did i tell you not to believe of what you believe in this case?
So I’m supposed to just take your word for it? Because that’s not how the world works.]missingpoints
Of course your response above stems from your unreflected attitude to my question. The case was that to believe of what you believe should pacify your agitated intellect. That is not really how the world works as you say though…then believe of what you believe..that's wiser decision.
[Do you honestly expect me to believe anything you say just because you said so? How arrogant of you.]missingpoints
you're susceptible to grave mistakes. did i say to you to believe what i say? hehe…read intelligently man…read of what the statement 'believe of what you believe' means..hehe….it seems that you hide your own arrogance…in my mind you're arrogant..and i'm arrogant to you…man….do you think your logic shows anything good?
Last word! I win!
I give you five internets!
Five internets for you!
Faith is the symbol of ignorance.
The believer in a deity makes the claim that god exists. Therefore, the burden of proof is on the believer. So far no one has produced any empirical evidence to support the existence of a deity. Of course, there are people who believe in ufos, Santa Claus, elves, gnomes, unicorns, and the tooth fairy. Their belief does not prove the existence of these figments of the imagination.
I respect everyone's opinion here.
I agree that the existence of a god is hard to quantify, test, and verify, just as hard as how to understand a girl that you love.
I have many kiddy questions in my mind about dinosaurs and the earth: how did the scientist knew that some dinosaurs eat meat? how can they be so sure of the color of the skin of such creatures (during model reconstruction) when they havent seen anything like that in living form in their life?
I also don't know how the first atom in the whole universe formed, i dont think you guys too will be convinced of the explanation of the scientists.. how does everything in the outer space happened?
I am filled with questions.
Last 2006, I was able to be with 3 nobel price awardees in physics and chemistry in Indianapolis RCA Dome. It is an international gathering for young inventors from all over the world. A student asked a question to the panel on what will happen if a human body will pass inside the black hole.
The panel gave their sincerest answer – but the hell, they'll never know until they TESTED it right? go out in outer space and try it themselves – THE REAL BLACK HOLE (not the simulations).
And thus I conclude that human logic and reason is insufficient to understand and conceive everything.